How Special Forces Threaded the Needle to Put Glock 19s on Every Team

The procurement does not often block good gear on the ground that it is bad; it blocks it because it was written on by the opposite. That fact dictated the sidearm environment of the U.S. military over the years. The Beretta M9 which became the default handgun in 1985 stayed in that role despite the special units pushing vigorously toward light and simple, more abuse resistant pistols. In the special operations fraternity, the demand signal was obvious: operators were shooting more, training harder, and carrying pistols in locations and positions where bulk and controls were significant. Relocating a polymer-framed, striker-fired Glock would have been logical but the lane with the “full-size fighting pistol” was already occupied.

Image Credit to Wikimedia Commons | Licence details

The workaround was not as much of an exception as a highly focused need, namely that a small pistol that would fit into civilian clothing was required by the U.S. Army Special Forces, and the standard-issue M9 did not serve that purpose. The requirement to have a civilian pair of clothes wear as outlined by retired Special Forces veteran Jeff Gurwitch in a first-hand account of the acquisition fitted perfectly to the footprint of the Glock 19: small enough to be hidden but large enough to perform as a duty-carry pistol, and crafted around a book of arms that reacted to pressure in the same manner.

Rather than romance, it involved more process. The Glock 19 was forced to undergo its operational and endurance test on the unit and it passed. The initial fielding was odd, with the pistols being treated as auxiliary gear and assigned to particular mission sets, as opposed to being assigned on a wall-to-wall basis. This was a first-issue Glock 19 that Gurwitch observed at late 2006 and that he reports a lengthy time span during which only approximately 60-70% of Special Forces troops were armed with Glock 19, the remainder still drawing M9s. That partial rollout was significant: it indicated that the pistol was already proving itself through high-round-count training cycles and in reality, but it also indicated that mixed inventories and the lack of consistent individual familiarity continued to plague teams.

By the end of 2015, the program was no longer called “extra” but it took the name “everyday.” Special Forces Command shifted to acquire Gen 4 Glock 19s with MOS cuts, which enabled it to issue one per operator, making a niche requirement an ordinary sidearm channel. This swivel is also useful in explaining a visual anomaly common in most photographs whereby small frames are used with large magazines. Even when such decisions compromised the reason behind the concealment, operators had often operated Glock 19s with longer Glock 17 magazines and accessories that increased control and capacity. The requirement converted the pistol in the door; end users set it up according to the fight they were expecting.

A different solution would be sought afterwards by the broader U.S. military in the Modular Handgun System competition with the SIG Sauer M17/M18 family being the one chosen to be generally issued. Special operations, in the meantime, were further developing the Glock 19 ecosystem, which saw a shift to slide-mounted optical systems with miniature red dots of SOCOM standard. The outcome was what is now in fact the training method of a sidearm: rapid presentations, target-oriented shooting, and a high rate of repetition with a steady trigger mechanism.

That arc has been effective far beyond SOCOM. In late 2023, the U.S. Coast Guard started a progressive replacement of the P229-DAK by the Glock 19 Gen5, where more than 700 handguns entered service as the initial stage of the replacement process, and reported an increase in the qualification rates and maintenance. Same underlying logic, different service, different mission set: a small 9mm designed to provide high volume training and direct maintenance.

Ultimately, the emergence of the Glock 19 within the Special Forces of the U.S. Army can be viewed as a roadmap to modernization within a limited context. It was not a revolution against the system. It was an exact requirement that made the system provide something that operators were able to live with, carry away when necessary and yet will do the job hard when the occasion became loud.

spot_img

More from this stream

Recomended

Discover more from Modern Engineering Marvels

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading