How the Super Hornet Became the Navy’s Go-To Jet for Today’s Hard Missions

Speed, stealth, and some breakthrough widget are not the real trick in the F/A-18E/F Super Hornet. It is endurance in the larger meaning: a carrier strike fighter that continued to take in new tasks, the changing nature of the Navy operating environment changing, and continue to be refurbished to accommodate it.

Image Credit to wikipedia.org

Super Hornet came in to fill a gap that the original Hornet family could not reach. The F/A-18 legacy was designed to be a carrier-capable, multirole, flexible aircraft based on the YF-17 and designed with reliability, maintainability, and high-angle-of-attack handling. The philosophy was relevant on the sea where turnaround time and deck tempo do not allow any forgiveness. However, when the Navy was confronted with life-after the A-6 Intruder and the F-14 Tomcat, it required greater range, more bring-back and more growth margin than the standard airframe could offer. The outcome was a jet bearing the same name but becoming so much larger, physically and architecturally, with a design 25 per cent greater, internal fuel increased 33 per cent and a construction that was designed to continue getting upgrades.

That larger footprint has purchased time on station and payload flexibility, but the long-term applicability of the Super Hornet has been that it has been able to continue to add sensors and networks and software without disintegrating the carrier-air-wing machine. The transition of the jet into a full-fledged node in a distributed battle is closely linked with the AN/APG-79 AESA radar, which in a document at the Naval Air Systems Command is referred to as a revolutionary leap in capability over and above evolutionary with Cmdr. Dave Dunaway commenting on it, stating that it is not an incremental change. Besides detection and track performance, the fiber channel architecture and processing pipeline of the AESA pushed the Super Hornet into a higher bandwidth sensing and faster decision cycles that carrier aviation badly needs when time, range, and threat density all intersect.

This is why deck crews had a nickname “Rhino” applied to the aircraft. The jet was the default weapon of the carrier as it could perform nearly everything (with at least reasonable effectiveness) in the same cycle: air-to-air defense, precision strike, ISR support, and organic tanking. The concept of the airframe and sustainment was defined to that rhythm where design decisions were more focused on reliability and quick repairs. The maintainability narrative is not a quibble in the larger Hornet lineage; it is a fundamental combat multiplier, particularly when sortie generation rises to be the ultimate determinant, instead of the optimum performance of one platform.

Block III builds upon that line of thought and solidifies it in a more sensor-saturated and networked age. The upgrade package is focused on a new cockpit, which is characterized by a large -inch (10×19 inch) display with a high-capacity touchscreen, a more powerful computing platform, and a sophisticated network suite based on the Distributed Targeting Processor Network and TTNT. It is also extending durability to a 10,000 hour service life, which suggests that the Navy is not only buying time and readiness but also new capability. The Block III configuration has also incorporated the requirements based on the signature reduction and the inclusion of the IRST, which enhances the capabilities of the jet to provide the tactical support when stealth is not its hallmark.

In the same vein is the family approach of the Super Hornet. Basing its own tactical electronic attack rearbone on the two-seat F-model evolved into the EA-18G Growler, which combines kinetic strike and sensing with non-kinetic effects to define what the rest of the air wing can safely accomplish. In the description of Boeing, the Super Hornet and Growler are put together to support what is referred to as distributed high-tempo operations, which shows how the platform is employed as a component of a larger system as opposed to an independent performer.

That particular combination, of carrier appropriateness, maintainability, a rich upgrade path, and an in-built electronic warfare equivalent, is why the Super Hornet is at the center even as stealth aircraft spread across the flight deck. It was not created to suit all the worlds it was flying in. It just continued to transform itself into one that could.

spot_img

More from this stream

Recomended

Discover more from Modern Engineering Marvels

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading